Thread: Bigfoot Pictoglyps in California

Tweet

Originally Posted by Tsloth

I love Bigfoot. I love the Bigfoot concept. But I feel the lack of evidence over the last 40 years speaks volumes. I understand the world/USA is a large place but for somebody not to get real evidence (nice clear video-minutes long; physical DNA evidence that doesn't match other animals). Too many people do hoaxes for no reason. The news just reported the acid in the face girl just admitted to falsifying the story and putting the acid on herself. If only she had accused the Jersey Devil and not a black female....

And if I see one more TV show with a redneck "researcher" chasing odd yeti sounds and presenting pushed down plants as evidence for Bigfoot I will start my own paranormal research club. Pushed down grass is pushed down grass...I don't care how much of a professional you are, you can't say Bigfoot did it?!

Now there are theories of Bigfoot and UFO's being linked..only slightly more far fetched but atleast that would provide a reason for not being able to locate them.

No offense, but you really need to do some research. They have DNA that they know is primate, but doesn't match anything known. They can easily tell fake footprints by their depth (you can measure how much weight caused the print 200 lbs. or 800 lbs.) Also by the bone structure. The Patterson film has recently by several different scientists, and different methods been proven to not be a man in a suit (although they won't say what they think it is). There are dermal ridges on some footprint casts(like fingerprints) that an FBI expert has stated could not be faked because they are completely unique, but make perfect sense due to the unique foot structure, etc... Yeah there are fakes out there, but there are renown PHD's researching this that can pick them out in a heartbeat, not sure where you are going with the UFO thing, that's a separate issue, just big smart apes, that know stay away from us. I will post some vids later, too late tonight.

"He had beautiful hair". I LOLed.

But seriously..I am interested in bigfoot/sasquatch, may not be proven, but seems likely given the track record of other "rare" animals not being seen such a creature might exist.

Hey Wolfman, I've seen a lot of BigFoot pics, shows, etc. & I've never seen that before . Thanks

I am on the fence on this one. However I do think man is too sure he knows everyone and new types of life are still being found so it possible. I more question if there are still there than if they ever where there.

Originally Posted by Dullahan

I always find cave paintings and the like hard to swallow because they also depicted images of things that were complete fantasy and legend. Like a man with wings and no head or something like that. I believe the majority of it is all story telling.

These things always bring to mind an Analogy I heard once. In 10,000 years Aliens land and uncover a picture of Elvis "Hmm" the one alien says, "Apparently this man was their KING"

My feelings exactly. LIke there must be Atlantis because Homer wrote about it. Why could he have not been writing fiction for fun?

A lot of these writings and drawings of such reminds me of an early form of internet... just because someone took the time to write it doesn't make it true.

Heck Ogg might have been doodling and said to Morg "huh me make man picture look funny hahaha-grunt".

Originally Posted by Yubney

My feelings exactly. LIke there must be Atlantis because Homer wrote about it. Why could he have not been writing fiction for fun?

A lot of these writings and drawings of such reminds me of an early form of internet... just because someone took the time to write it doesn't make it true.

Heck Ogg might have been doodling and said to Morg "huh me make man picture look funny hahaha-grunt".

I think there was an Atlantis of some form and the people of Atlantis probably had some technology or knowledge that made them more advanced that those around them however I do partly agree with you. I think Homer was writing fiction but based on a true story that has been pasted down the generations.

As far as the big foot picture, you make a good point. The drawing could have been stories parents made up to tell their kids or our version of a play. They had to something to amused themselves.