Thread: USB to DMX

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. Collapse Details
    USB to DMX
    #1
    WindyCityCouple is offline Crypt Keeper
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    109


    I am trying my first DMX setup and need advice on which USB to DMX device to use. I know Enttec is good but whats the difference between the DMX USB Pro and the Open DMX USB? I am a home haunt thing and dont want to pay all the extra for the pro unless it really matters.

    Any experts out there???
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    crazybob is offline The Great Pumpkin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    425
    I know the USB pro has some advantages, but i've been using OpenDMX for years and have had no problems with it.
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    WindyCityCouple is offline Crypt Keeper
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    109
    I have looked all over to try to figure what the hell the advantage is with no luck.

    Quote Originally Posted by crazybob View Post
    I know the USB pro has some advantages, but i've been using OpenDMX for years and have had no problems with it.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #4
    Hooked_on_Scares's Avatar
    Hooked_on_Scares is offline The Great Pumpkin
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    436
    Blog Entries
    3
    I have the Pro, and have used both the Open and the Velleman.

    The Velleman and VSA do not play well together, as soon as you use more than 5 or so channels (last I checked) - the speed of playback gets warped, and it goes out of sync with the audio.

    The Open didn't exhibit the above problem, and I've never seen any problems with it myself, even with long runs. However, Phoenix_AU_was_UK has run into problems with it under certain circumstances. Because it isn't electrically isolated from the computer, it would be more susceptible to electrical noise than the Pro.

    The Pro is electrically isolated from the host computer. So, any electrical garbage that ends up on the DMX lines (from laying next to AC lines, etc) won't have any possibility of messing with the USB connection.

    Aside from this, there is a frame rate difference too. This has to do with how quickly the DMX controller refreshes the data sent out to DMX devices. The quicker the refresh, the smoother your animation can be. I found the Velleman to be the slowest, the Open to be in the middle, and the Pro advertizes itself as being as fast as the DMX standard will allow for.

    I bought the Pro to 'beat up' the Medusa DMX board, to make sure it worked properly under all circumstances. But, based on my personal experience so far, if I were just building a prop, I'd get the Open.

    - Hook
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #5
    WindyCityCouple is offline Crypt Keeper
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    109
    Thanks! You sold me on the medusa as well so look for the notice from paypal!
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #6
    moshrider1000's Avatar
    moshrider1000 is offline The Great Pumpkin
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Southwest WI
    Posts
    278
    As Hook eluded to it really depends what you are trying to do with it as much as anything else.

    So what are you trying to do with it?
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #7
    WindyCityCouple is offline Crypt Keeper
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    109
    At this point run a coffin prop. In the prop I will have a fogger, two LED lights sets, and maybe 8 pneumatic devices.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #8
    buckaneerdude's Avatar
    buckaneerdude is offline Bucky Brain Surgeon
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Posts
    887
    Here is a thread I started last February when I began the venture into DMX. There's lots of good advice and how to's in the thread from many of the Stars of this forum. What would we do without them?

    DMX Basics
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
    #9
    dadgonemad's Avatar
    dadgonemad is offline The Great Pumpkin
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Richmond Hill, GA
    Posts
    370
    As I understand it, the Pro version has its own microprocessor to generate the DMX data stream. The Open version relies on the computer CPU do generate it, so it is susceptible to lagging if the computer becomes process heavy.

    I've used the Velleman for two years (12 channels and no problems), but upgraded to the Open this year due to the feedback on this forum. However, for a show I'm doing in November, I need two separate control systems, so I also got a Pro to drive my Medusa board and DMX dimmer packs.

    For your purposes, the Open sounds fine. If you're thinking about long-term DMX control, perhaps the Pro is worth the investment.

    -dgm
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
    #10
    dpeterson's Avatar
    dpeterson is offline Werewolf
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chicago (soon)
    Posts
    89
    Hook_On_Scares and Dadgonemad are right about the Pro: it is electrically isolated and it has a microprocessor, which off-loads the DMX data stream updating from the host CPU. It is the best way to go at this date and time.
    David Peterson
    Reply With Quote
     

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts